Unlocking High-Quality Education: A Comparative Analysis of Online versus Traditional Teaching Modalities in a Higher Education Institution in Milagro, Ecuador
Keywords:
online courses, quality of education, learning methods, higher education, new technologyAbstract
Introduction: Nowadays, the quality of teaching is a key and decisive factor in the field of education. Technological innovations have transformed teaching and learning, sparking debates among the academic community about the vision of online learning and, in this case, whether it achieves the same level as face-to-face learning.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of online teaching in relation to traditional education in supporting students' academic success and English language proficiency.
Methodology: This study employed an applied quantitative, quasi-experimental research design to compare the effects of different teaching modalities. The sample consisted of 348 undergraduate students enrolled in an English Language Teaching (ELT) programme, who were non-randomly assigned across eight distinct experimental groups. Data were collected using a standardised achievement test administered to all participants. For the statistical analysis of group differences, a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied, with a significance level of 0.05.
Results: Both online and traditional groups achieved equal academic performance, indicating that the modalities used do not affect performance and that equal opportunities are provided to all students.
Key recommendation: It is essential to examine the pedagogical frameworks that shape learning experiences at different levels, and their implications for student participation, knowledge retention, and long-term progress. These factors are vital for both educators and policymakers focused on improving instructional strategies.
Innovative contribution: The study integrates cognitive processes with observable behaviours by examining academic performance across various learning strategies. This contributes to the development of effective teaching strategies adapted to specific contexts by providing them with solid evidence.
Conclusion: Advances in technology have transformed education by providing numerous forms of learning that extend beyond the traditional teaching framework.
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf
Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ907749
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Surkes, M. A. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: A review of research. Computers & Education, 75, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.001
Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. A. (2012). The impact of online education on student outcomes: Evidence from a randomized trial. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1094-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.06.004
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2020). The digital divide in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges and opportunities. United Nations. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Turk, D. (2020). A framework for evaluating online education. Online Learning, 24(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2186
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://www.sri.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/effectiveness_of_online_and_blended_learning.pdf
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2017). Effects of personalized learning approaches on students' academic performance: Findings from a study of schools implementing personalized learning. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2042.html
Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.207
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225
Ramírez, C., & Cuenca, J. (2021). Access to digital education in Ecuador and the digital divide: A critical analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 83, 102416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102416
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Swan, K. (2017). An exploration of social presence and the impact on the learning outcomes of online courses. Computers & Education, 70, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.010
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum International Publishing.
Selwyn, N. (2020). Should robots replace teachers? The implications of educational technology for the future of education. Polity Press.
Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom-based training: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 623-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frans Recalde García, Paolo Fabre Merchán, Jorge Zambrano Pachay , Sofía Guevara Peñaranda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
